Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Bush Planning Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security Cuts
JREGrassroots > General Politics > The Economy
ncMindy
QUOTE
President Remains Eager to Cut Entitlement Spending

By Michael Abramowitz
The Washington Post

Friday 11 August 2006

The Bush administration has begun sounding out lawmakers and other key figures about mounting a new bipartisan effort to rein in the costs of Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security after the midterm elections, according to officials in the administration and on Capitol Hill.

No specific plan has been advanced, and administration officials are proceeding gingerly given the political debacle that beset the White House last year when President Bush promoted a plan to create private accounts in the Social Security program. But they have been sending strong signals in recent weeks that they want to try something again after the elections in November.
...

"We need to cut entitlement spending," the president said in one typical comment last month, as he reviewed the midyear budget numbers. "The easy fix is to say 'Let somebody else deal with it.' This administration is going to continue trying to work with Congress to deal with these issues."

Fulfilling this pledge is a tall order and, even in the view of some of Bush's strongest supporters, beyond the capacity of a politically weakened administration facing the prospect of serious losses in the fall elections. Democrats appear eager to use the issue as a political cudgel for the time being; Paulson's comments triggered a new round of accusations that Bush plans to "privatize" Social Security.

Grover Norquist, a leading GOP strategist, said he can envision no circumstance in which Bush could secure any overhaul of the Social Security program, including creating personal accounts. "The Democrats cannot be bribed, cajoled or threatened into voting for Social Security reform - it can't happen," he said.

LINK


Emphasis mine. Norquist said that!?! blink.gif
suswah
QUOTE
Just how to do so is what White House officials are pondering. In his last State of the Union speech, Bush discussed his desire to create a bipartisan entitlements commission to explore the issue. A previous Bush commission was limited by design to proponents of private accounts and was broadly dismissed by most Democrats. The administration floated the idea of another bipartisan panel, with a broader mandate, but found no takers in the opposition party.


This is Karl Rove's thing. It always has been. Why can't he just give it up? And I wonder why they aren't worried about the overspending on mercenaries? But then I guess that's just a drop in the great, big ole budget bucket. wacko.gif

And Grover Norquist ~ do you think there's a rift? unsure.gif
judykratochvil
We better watch that these fiscal Nazis (read Norquist and his froends) don't take over bevause they will place us in danger of not having a government. Then they will work to have the same creation at the state level. I am a fiscal conservative, however, I think we need to attack the waste, fraud, and abuse in the National Security State. Defense and Homeland Security are able to waste money ad nauseum, but how dare social programs even exist. These people do not seem fear the National Security administrative state, but they do the Social administrative state.
suswah
QUOTE(judykratochvil @ Aug 12 2006, 11:04 AM) [snapback]92079[/snapback]

We better watch that these fiscal Nazis (read Norquist and his froends) don't take over bevause they will place us in danger of not having a government. Then they will work to have the same creation at the state level. I am a fiscal conservative, however, I think we need to attack the waste, fraud, and abuse in the National Security State. Defense and Homeland Security are able to waste money ad nauseum, but how dare social programs even exist. These people do not seem fear the National Security administrative state, but they do the Social administrative state.


It seems to be a very schizophrenic ideology ~ and the mental illness is just becoming too acceptable. mad.gif
Benny
I agree with Judy in when she says we need to clean up fraud and abuse everywhere.

Speaking of, there's been some activity on Alternet recently about Katrina by columnist Earl Ofari Hutchinson, entitled, ""Lessons of Katrina, One year Later." Here's a snip of the discussion:

QUOTE
For one week last September, the unthinkable happened, America's poor suddenly became the rage. The shocking and tormenting sight of thousands of poor blacks fleeing in headlong panic for their lives from Hurricane Katrina's floodwaters jolted the nation and the world. President Bush reeling from the battering he took in the media for his initial comatose response to the Katrina victims scrambled fast and talked tough about assailing poverty. In a televised speech in New Orleans' famed Jackson Square, Bush told the nation "All of us saw on television, there is also some deep, persistent poverty in this region as well."

The rhetoric about aiding the poor quickly flew hot and heavy. Congressional leaders vowed to budget millions more for the poor. Business leaders vowed to pump more dollars into job and skills training programs. Private charities vowed to launch new fundraising drives for the poor. Even many hard-bitten, laissez faire conservatives who reflexively oppose massive government spending programs on the poor screamed at Bush to do something about poverty.


The link is to my comment to both the columnist and the poster, but more so to Mr. Hutchinson as he was critical of JRE and the poster decided to attack JRE personally.

BTW, most of you know JRE is going to be on C-SPAN tomorrow night..Road to the WH? smile.gif

This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.