Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: New World Order/Religion?
JREGrassroots > General Politics > Worldviews
ConcernedParent
New World Order/Religion?
I'm not implying that anyone is stupid. The word stupid in the article is part of the article itself.

I'm not saying that I agree or disagree. This is Food For Thought for inquiring minds of religion.

----------------

Hey Stupid, The New World Order IS About Religion
By Sherry Shriner




With thunderous applause liberty dies and those who fight to maintain liberty can't even grasp the entire picture of what the fight is about.

I don't know how many times I have seen patriots get angry or enraged in public forums because the mention of God is made when it comes to the New World Order. They proclaim the New World Order is about politics and not religion as they task away at bits and pieces exposing the lies and deceptions of the order. How shocked will they be to find out soon enough that the New World Order is a politicalization of religion and that the two can't and won't be separated.

The entire purpose of the New World Order is to bring Lucifer down to earth and enforce worldwide worship of him as God. Satan's right hand man on earth whom the Bible calls the False Prophet, will implement and enforce worldwide worship of Lucifer as God. The Bible refers to them as beasts because that is exactly what they are.

Most know Lucifer as one of these last days beast's as the Antichrist. The occultic groups call him "the One" or the "God of Light." Some say Lucifer will just arrive as himself masquerading as an angelic being, others declare it will be a human political or religious figure who dies and then comes back to life and then visibly descends to earth from heaven.

Read Whole Article
http://www.sherrytalkradio.com/sherry/nwo.htm

From CP
ncMindy
Bush says he's on 'mission from god' - does this count? blink.gif

QUOTE
George Bush: 'God told me to end the tyranny in Iraq'

President told Palestinians God also talked to him about Middle East peace

Ewen MacAskill
Friday October 7, 2005
The Guardian

George Bush has claimed he was on a mission from God when he launched the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, according to a senior Palestinian politician in an interview to be broadcast by the BBC later this month.

Mr Bush revealed the extent of his religious fervour when he met a Palestinian delegation during the Israeli-Palestinian summit at the Egpytian resort of Sharm el-Sheikh, four months after the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

One of the delegates, Nabil Shaath, who was Palestinian foreign minister at the time, said: "President Bush said to all of us: 'I am driven with a mission from God'. God would tell me, 'George go and fight these terrorists in Afghanistan'. And I did. And then God would tell me 'George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq'. And I did."

Mr Bush went on: "And now, again, I feel God's words coming to me, 'Go get the Palestinians their state and get the Israelis their security, and get peace in the Middle East'. And, by God, I'm gonna do it."

LINK


Are you a fan of the "Blues Brother's" movie? I'm beginning to think *w* is on the wrong mission. wacko.gif
ConcernedParent
QUOTE(ncMindy @ Oct 7 2005, 09:45 PM)
Bush says he's on 'mission from god' - does this count? blink.gif

[/color]

Are you a fan of the "Blues Brother's" movie?  I'm beginning to think *w* is on the wrong mission. wacko.gif
[right][snapback]85126[/snapback][/right]


Hello ncMindy,

Thank you for your response. I would have responded to you earlier on the New World Order topic, but I did not recieve the notification email.

You know, I really appreciate what you have to say and I am always ready to enjoy each and every response to all the most important topics of the day that you send to me and everyone else here at JRE.

But I agree with your centiment whole heartedly.

ncMindy, I got something else for you to read.

Illuminati News
http://www.illuminati-news.com/

Read this and tell me what you think later. You don't have to get in a hurry to respond because I want you to fully take in what you read.

And for the other readers who are reading my response to you, I want them to know that its for them too.

Thank you very much ncMindy. smile.gif

CP

ncMindy
Check this out, CP - ohmy.gif

LINK

Tank in Texas
Hmm. I'm not much one for this kind of thing, don't believe in a Satan-figure or Lucifer or whatever. There are enough evil people out there to out-evil any one being, demonic or not. I've always preferred the symbolic view of religious texts- what's written in the Bible is not meant to be taken literally. However, utilizing the worldview espoused herein, I have some questions:

How can Lucifer be "[brought] down to earth?" I thought Lucifer had already fallen in the extra-Biblical mythology.

Why do we have to use "beasts" as a derogative term? Perhaps that is one reason the righties can justify horrible treatment of animals because they are demonized instead of being honored in their religious literature. Sherry obviously thinks "beasts" are bad.

Doesn't the author's vague pronouncements of Lucifer's "right hand man" here on earth and "antichrist" talk simply allow for her to decry anybody with which she doesn't agree as part of the whole NWO plot?

rolleyes.gif rolleyes.gif rolleyes.gif



ncMindy
Hi Tank --
Just living in the South, I've heard this theory all my life. I find the far right sitting on the board of BJU, and other's interesting. Only in America, can we find ourselves being pushed into religious and political activism. For me it's all about control of the people. While the wealthy elite get richer, poor people pray. IMO, the South being so red, is only because they really believe what they are hearing.

QUOTE
Consider this: George W. Bush  is president because the Supreme Court voted along party-lines, led by Justice Antonin Scalia. At least two Justices, Scalia and Thomas, are members of the Federalist Society, a CNP-affiliated group.  In one of his first policy decisions after taking office, Bush announced he would end the American Bar Association's role in pre-screening federal judicial nominees. Prospective judges will now be screened by the Federalist Society. I believe the Supreme Court majority installed Bush, not necessarily as a power-grab for the presidency, but as a power-grab for their own judicial branch -- to insure that the next round of federal judges appointed to the bench will be arch-conservatives.

The power-grab for SCOTUS is almost complete, at this point. This article was written in 2002. I don't cotton to the idea of mixing religion with politics, but it seems to have worked. Thus, we have the radical right-wing. rolleyes.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.